
"Transparency is the new objectivity"
— David Weinberger
Have posted the data from RIDE's proposed funding formula to a Google Docs spreadsheet, and what jumps out at me is the number of East Bay communities taking double-digit hits.
Update: I did a quick sum, and East Bay towns would lose $18.M in state funding. With the exception of Barrington, which gets an extra $3.7M.
Karen suggested another Future Search — but instead of getting a group together to envision the innovative possibilities for our schools, we'll need to plan for the grim scenario of cutting $260K worth of programs every year, until, 10 years out, we are operating a system with $2.6M less than today.
And I'm with Maddie, who commented on a previous post: Barrington gets a 189% increase. WTF?
Update: Newport Now has a description of the hit Island-wide.
Update 2: Added a column from the State's 2010 Fiscal Stress Test that shows the financial health of each municipality — scores over 4 are more stressed. If Tiverton has the highest level in the East Bay at 3.35, it makes no sense to cut their state contribution by 26%. Or Portsmouth, for that matter, at 2.86 cut by 47%. Barrington, at a comparatively balmy stress level of 1.89 sees a 190% increase.
And while the RIDE report does show the formula by which state share is calculated:

It does not provide any backup data (or even pointers to find) the EWAV data (Equalized Weighted Assessed Property Value) on which it is based. RIDE does provide the K-6 Free and Reduced Price Lunch numbers, used as a proxy for economic hardship, and I have added those to a column in the spreadsheet as well.
Update 3: Thanks to an anonymous reader, here's the link to the EWAV data on RI Municipal Finance, and I've added it to the GoogleDocs spreadsheet. Unfortunately, I still can't see how you plug this into the equation — the presentation describes the EWAV value as "a number between 0 and 1 based on each district's assessed real estate values and a media income value." Any ideas?
Resources:
Fiscal Stress and Financial Condition of RI Cities and Towns (pdf) from the Dept. of Municipal Finance
EWAV data from RI Municipal Finance
Comments
Education Funding Formula for EWAV data
I'm not a math major, but it doesn't take an advanced degree of any kind to figure out what EWAV2 is.
If one is presented a mathematical formula, and then provided a key to understanding all the elements EXCEPT ONE, there are only two possible choices: either (1) it was an oversight or (2) it was intentionally left out. I don't give the benefit of the doubt when it comes to the government, so I don't believe it was an oversight. Backup for the EWAV2 data was, I believe, deliberately left out to hide something.
And, what Gist is hiding is obvious. It is her own personal value judgment about how much a community should be paying. It is a typical "fudge factor" that bureaucrats throw into formulas so that they can adjust outcomes according to their whim.
In short, EWAV is not an acronym, but a neologism meaning "Shut up and pay what I say. I'm the Education Commissioner and what I say goes."